May a judicial officer refuse to cross the picket line made up of striking county employees and stay away from the courthouse?
May the judicial officer arrange to hold court in a location away from the courthouse?
May a judicial officer cancel criminal proceedings such as prisoner first appearance dockets, arraignments and trial dockets?
May a judicial officer cancel civil proceedings such as anti-harassment cases, domestic cases and civil jury trials?
Answer
It would be a violation of CJC Canon 2 and Canon 3(A)(5) for a judicial officer to refuse to cross the picket line and stay away from courthouse. A judicial officer has a responsibility to see that the court's business is conducted promptly.
A judicial officer should not make arrangements to hold court in a location away from the courthouse to avoid crossing a picket line because judicial duties should be performed at the courthouse unless the law provides that those duties may be discharged in another location.
It would be a violation of Canon 3(A)(5) for a judicial officer to cancel criminal proceedings such as prisoner first appearance dockets, arraignments and trial dockets solely because of a labor dispute. A judicial officer has a duty to dispose promptly of the business of the court.
It would be a violation of Canon 3(A)(5) for a judicial officer to cancel civil proceedings such as anti-harassment cases, domestic cases and civil jury trials solely because of a labor dispute. A judicial officer has a duty to dispose promptly of the business of the court.
NOTE: Effective June 23, 1995, the Supreme Court amended the Code of Judicial Conduct. In addition to reviewing the ethics advisory opinions, the following should be noted:
Opinion 92-18—CJC Canon 3(A)(5) became 3(A)(6).
The Supreme Court adopted a new Code of Judicial Conduct effective January 1, 2011. In addition to reviewing the ethics advisory opinions, the following should be noted: